Reading time: 4 minutes
Last month, five directors resigned from The vegan society following allegations that the charity is “institutionally racist” and homophobic.
Eshe Kiama Zuri, Michele Fox, Sally Anderson, Joel Bravette and Robb Masters have resigned from the board.
“Not a safe place”
The Vegan Society is the oldest of its kind in the world. It aims to provide an educational platform that advocates veganism.
Zuri, who was the organization’s vice president, shared their long resignation letter online.
In it, they said they were “naive” to believe that “their time, energy and contribution would be respected and welcomed”.
“As a young administrator who has been repeatedly marginalized, being black, gay, disabled and working class, I brought to the board a perspective that challenged not only the administrators as individuals,” they said. stated, “but also the systemic racism and oppression that exists in any organization. set up without taking the time to consider diversity or inclusiveness and with a hierarchical, patriarchal and white supremacist structure that some board members have spent years honing.
They added that the board of the Vegan Society “hunts” anyone with different or progressive opinions, and wants to be able to “steer the association towards a 1944 ideal.”
“I can say with confidence that the Vegan Society is not a safe place for young people, for blacks, for gays or for any other marginalized person,” continued Zuri.
They described the organization as having a “hostile work environment from the start,” which included micro-attacks, racially motivated complaints and a smear campaign. They also reported abuse, threats and targeted bullying.
Hours after being voted on by the board, Zuri alleged that a director said the N word to them during a conversation.
“I’m not giving up, I was forced out. I have no choice, ”they said, later adding that they felt“ broken and discouraged ”. Former board member Bravette also saw his “lived experience” ignored by the board, his letter said.
And in Ex-Chairman Masters’ resignation, he reported a “toxic environment”. The masters also reported that transphobia and ableism were common in the board.
The Vegan Society responds
The Vegan Society shared a statement online following the resignations.
“There have been conflicts within the board of directors which we have worked hard to resolve and it is unfortunate that the most recent resignations were received the day before a scheduled mediation session,” the association wrote. charitable. He also “wished them good luck in their future endeavors.”
In their letter, Zuri confirmed that they did not want to go through mediation to avoid reliving difficult experiences.
The Vegan Society continued, “As with many charities, the Vegan Society has a number of challenges that we must address as we evolve into an even more diverse and inclusive organization.”
“This is something we are actively working on, supported by respected external ED&I consultants, and our commitment is to foster an inclusive environment for all of our staff, directors, members and supporters. “
Investigation
In February 2021, the company order Ijeoma Omambala QC to investigate the alleged inappropriate behavior of Zuri and Masters.
In summary, the board claimed that Zuri shared “racist” comments online and that Masters “allowed” discriminatory behavior.
In the report, Omambala said: “I do not support any of the complaints against [Masters]. There is no evidence to suggest that [Masters] acted illegally or in violation of their obligations as trustee or president of the Company.
The report goes on to say: “I specify that I am not criticizing the fact that [Zuri] expressed his frustration, disappointment and anger towards The Vegan Society in these posts.
“This is the medium – the language used which I consider inappropriate and unprofessional since the posts can easily be related to the Company.”
He added that “the vast majority of complaints against Zuri have not been upheld”.
He also said the Society has repeatedly manhandled Zuri – referring to them with pronouns they don’t use.
“Real concerns”
The report identified nine mitigating factors. These included a “deep personal animosity” towards Zuri and their identity, as well as their position on various political issues.
He also said council members criticized Zuri for “voicing their real concerns”.
“I am particularly satisfied that [Zuri’s] concerns regarding their treatment by certain Board members and in relation to diversity and inclusiveness in the Company were raised in good faith, ”the report continues.
“[Zuri] had previously and appropriately raised concerns about the language used by Board members that raised issues of equality, diversity and inclusion. These were not dealt with adequately in a timely manner, ”Omambala wrote.
The report revealed that in June 2019, Zuri suggested that board members take training on inclusiveness and diversity. The council did not see the proposal succeed.
Further, the report said the board “is not equipped to have mature and constructive conversations on diversity and inclusion issues; nor is it able to effectively meet the challenges of the dominant orthodoxies ”.
The report made 15 recommendations for The Vegan Society. These included adopting a written procedure for handling complaints against trustees, as well as implementing appropriate policies and procedures that protect whistleblowers.
Additionally, Omambala recommended that the Vegan Society work “quickly and positively” to deal with relationship breakdowns with external facilitation.
Diversity efforts
In June 2020, the Vegan Society shared a Publish on the Black Lives Matter movement. The association is committed to “doing better”.
“We are going to work towards these objectives: to amplify BAME [Black, Asian, and minority ethnic] vegan voices on our platforms, hiring more BAME staff, including in positions of authority. “
The company said it will recognize BAME excellence within the vegan community, reach out to BAME communities to offer support, and provide BAME vegans with access to its Vegan Society grant program. The program, which started in 2013, funds small and medium-sized local nonprofits that encourage people to go veg.
The Vegan Society said at the time that it recognized that organizations should “not only show their support, but also act on it.”
A spokesperson for the Vegan Society spoke to The vegan review on the controversy.
They said, “We are actively trying to increase diversity in our organization and encourage applications from all sections of the community. We will offer an automatic interview to all applicants who meet our essential criteria and who identify as being of an under-represented race or ethnicity or as deaf, neurodiverse or living with a disability.
“The Vegan Society, as an organization, values equality, diversity and inclusion. We want to be an organization that tackles any discrimination or structural prejudice… The company has also proactively provided its platforms and campaigns to amplify voices and recognize excellence from a wide range of vegans, including vegans. black.
“The company has proactively reached out to affected groups to support access to its Engaging New Audiences grant program, and has received 39 applications to date as a result of this outreach.”
* Updated August 10, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. BST *
This article has been updated to clarify the publication dates of the report. Further details have been included based on comments from affected parties.
